Misrepresentation
A considerable number
of anti-abortion visuals feature
an almost fully developed fetus.
Abortions preformed at this stage
via hysterotomy or D&X abortions are rare.
Only about 1.5% of abortions are performed
at 21-weeks or older, according to according
to a 2000 study conducted by the Nation
Center for Chronic Disease (CDC). A July
1992 LIFE magazine article,
The Great Divide, reported that
Reverend Robert Schenk, member of anti-choice
coalition Operation rescue, attended
a demonstration outside an abortion
clinic in Buffalo, NY, with "Baby
Tia", a 7-inch, gray-tinted and formaldehyde-soaked
dead fetus. In the escalating madness
of the crowd, the fetus was dropped
onto the sneaker-trodden street.
Authorities arrested Schenk and confiscated the
fetus, which was taken to a coroner, only to be
identified as an approximately 20-week-old
stillborn. The article reads, "Many
pro-choice supporters in Buffalo are
angry about the distance between their
reality-what they see in the clinics-and
the images the anti-abortionists present
as fact. 'What they are showing to the
public is a lie,' says Joni Ladowski, a nurse at a
nearby clinic, as she unfolds a length of gauze.
In the center lies what appears to be a clot
the size of a peanut. It is a fetus, nine
weeks old. 'This is an abortion,'
she says."
|
|
Tear-drop baby
First used in the
anti-abortion campaign by Dr. J.C.
Willke, president and founder
of International Right to Life,
in his 1971 book, Handbook on Abortion, this
picture has circulated through anti-choice
brochures and websites without much
question of its origin or accuracy.
This picture depicts a ruptured tubal
pregnancy that Willke would like
you to believe is 6-weeks-old.
A 6-week-old fetus,
from crown-to-rump, measures 4-5
mm, according to William's Obstetrics,
or 1/6-1/5 inch (the size of
a BB pellet). The fetus in the photo, when
compared to the fingers holding it, appears
to be about an inch in length or the
size of an 8- to 10-week-old fetus.
|
|
|
We have also posted a photo of
a 6-week-old fetus that was published in
A Child is Born, by Lennart Nilsson. The two are
demonstrably different! Accurately
labeling the fetus's gestational
age is important because this
photo represents the mortality of developing life.
One may look at this picture and see a
fetus only into its second month of development
and think, "look how far it's come."
But when labeled accurately, this
fetus would be approaching its second
trimester, a period when only 12% of
abortions are performed, according to the CDC
abortion surveillance.
The least
apparent, yet possibly
the most disturbing element of this photo
is its attribution. Although the caption
reads, "Photo by Robert Wolfe,
with permission Bell Museum of Pathology,
University of Minnesota," the Bell
Museum at U of M is a natural history museum;
it always has been. And when we asked Willke for
information from his copy, he said it
was simply not in his possession anymore.
This photo gained its popularity partially
because of Willke, yet he doesn't even
have his original copy.
|
|
Gestational Age
Accurately labeling
the fetus in a picture is a testament
to the source's credibility. Unfortunately,
a collection of pro-life web sites
and brochures label their pictures
through a method inconsistent with
medical practices. Gestational age can be labeled
by the date of conception or by the last
menstrual cycle. The medical establishment
goes by the latter. However, when
I asked Willke which method he used,
he replied in an email, "This all depends
on the picture, the source references and the use
in reference." Willke labeled the picture to the
right as a 10-week-old fetus in his book,
Handbook on Abortion. However, it was
later identified as a 12- to 14-week-old
fetus by Dr. Andrew Ross, Denver
ob-gyn. Apparently, consistency was
not a priority in the identification
of this photo, nor were the standards
of the medical community.
|
|
|
Malachi
Malachi, the literal
poster-child for the anti-choice campaign,
is a gruesome example of inaccuracy.
The back of this 3 x 5 inch card claims
that the fetus's life ends in pain. However,
judging from the fetus's gray skin, it was aborted
via laminaria through an intra-amniotic injection
or was done to preserve the mother's
life, Andrew Ross. If the procedure was
done while the fetus was alive, its skin
would be the pinkish color of its left leg.
|
Choice is
Abortion
This picture, also distributed
on a 3 x 5 inch card and used in numerous
anti-abortion campaigns is equally
inconsistent. If the forceps securing its
head over the jar are standard OR ring forceps, the
ring is 1 x 0.5 centimeters, which would
mean that the head is too small to be in
its third trimester, yet one less developed
would not have that much hair, says Dr. Ross.
"I strongly suspect that this picture is fake, and the
information on the back of the card certainly
does not match what's shown," he adds. The
second, and most obvious, fallacy lies within
the description. It says that the pictured
fetus was aborted in 1987 in Texas. However,
that was the year that third trimester abortions
were banned, rendering the alleged procedure
altogether illegal.
|
Photograph from Foundation
for Life
10900 NW Freeway #112
Houston, TX
77092
|
Fetal Brain Waves
The National Right to Life Committee
released a pamphlet, When Does Life
Begin, which states that at six weeks, a fetus
has measurable brain waves detected
by a an electroencephalogram. But using
hard-to-pronounce medical terms
to gain credibility does not add
substance to this dubious claim. Even at 7-weeks
into development, a fetus's brain is the
size of a pinhead. Detecting minute
brain activity through all the muscle
contractions that go on inside a woman's
mid-region is a medically unsubstantiated
assertion that has not been published in any
peer-reviewed journal.
The same pamphlet also cites an article,
"What the fetus feels," from the
British Medical Journal. This article, lacking any
references to studies, supports the
organization's claim that the fetus
can feel pain. However, in its conclusion,
it reads "It is hardly surprising that
infants delivered by difficult forceps
extraction act as if they have a sever headache."
A severe headache?!? How does a newly delivered
infant act as if it has a severe headache?
This article is simply an example of
how anti-choice activists use flawed sources
and fallacious information to prove
an often medically-unsubstantiated point.
For example, Willke, despite outright
refutes from The National Cancer Institute,
the American Cancer Society, and the
American Coalition of Obstetricians and
Gynecologists, insists that abortion causes breast
cancer.
More Information on images, fetal pain,
embryology and fetal personhood:
|
This photo first appeared in the
book "Handbook on Abortion", written by Dr. & Mrs J.C. Willke and
published in 1971. The caption reads: "This is the result of one morning's
work in a Canadian teaching hospital."
Prior to 1969, abortion was completely illegal in Canada. From 1969 to1988
abortion was highly restricted and women who needed abortions had
to have their cases heard by Therapeutic Abortion Committees, three doctors,
who would decide if their abortions were "medically necessary". Many women
were turned down. Dr. Morgentaler did perform abortions but his clinics
were illegal and he went to jail for ten months.
With draconian abortion laws in place it's impossible that several "babies"
would be aborted routinely on a daily basis. In addition, hospitals don't
throw fetuses in Gladbag-lined bins. It apppears that the fetuses/babies
in the photo are either premature deliveries or stillbirths "arranged" for
the photo shoot by anti abortion hospital staff.
|
What does an early abortion
look like?
When does
the embryo fetus become human?
Although a fetus may show
some response to a noxious stimulus, this is a reflex response
at least until 26 weeks gestation, as nerve fibres
responsible for pain do not begin to reach higher brain areas until
26 to 34 weeks gestation. Source: Medical
Practitioners Board of Victoria: http://www.dhs.vic.gov.au/ahs/archive/report/report3.htm
More on fetal pain: The Journal of the American
Medical Association: http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/294/8/947
On one
pro life site it is claimed that: "the
cortex isn’t needed to feel pain. The thalamus is needed and
is functioning at 8 weeks. Even complete removal of the cortex does
not eliminate the sensation of pain. "Indeed there seems to be little
evidence that pain information reaches the sensory cortex." http://www.abortionfacts.com/online_books/love_them_both/why_cant_we_love_them_both_14.asp
What the thalamus does is act as a sorting and switching station
located deep inside the brain. The thalamus quickly forwards the
pain message simultaneously to three specialized regions of the brain:
the physical sensation region (somatosensory cortex), the emotional
feeling region (limbic system) and the thinking region (frontal cortex).
Your brain responds to pain by sending messages that moderate the pain
in the spinal cord. http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/pain/PN00017
Even with a fully functioning thalamus sorting and
sending messages, if the cortex is not developed enough to receive
them, there will be no consciousness or feeling of pain.
Links to human
embryology sites
|
|